|
Children's time: “God is in charge of giving water” I read them this story from Exodus 17:1-7.
Then I told the children: Raise your hand if you remember ever being very thirsty. Raise your hand if you can tell me one thing about what it feels like to be thirsty. Raise your hand if you can tell me how it feels to drink water after you've been really thirsty. The Bible has a lot of stories about water in it. You remember I told you that the Bible was written in another language? One of the languages was Greek. In Greek, instead of saying river water or flowing water, or moving water, they would say living water. Jesus sort of made it into a joke in the story Heather and I are reading from the Bible. He called himself the living water. How many of you feel thirsty now that I've talked so much about water? (I pulled out a tray full of cups of water.) What do you think is supposed to happen with these little cups of water? (I gave them to the children.) What do you think is supposed to happen with all these cups of water? (I pulled out a cart full of cups of water. The children give them to the congregation.) The Samaritans in northern Palestine and the Jews in Judah to the south had been rivals for about 200 years; The Samaritans worshiped at Mr. Gerizim, and the Jews worshiped at the temple in Jerusalem. Each group knew they were worshiping God the right way, and the others were wrong and unclean. Jesus is on his way back to Galilee, and passes through Samaria. Listen for the word of God as it is found in John 4:5-42
This ends our reading of God's word. Let us listen to the choir interpret it. Last week, three-year-old Maggie was in Rogers Hall during the Women's Support Group meeting. She noticed with joy that “there was a rainbow on a chair!” I told her it came from the crystal door, and pointed to the exterior door, where the sun was shining through the cut glass, and making rainbows all over the carpet. The facets of the cut glass act as prisms and separate the colors of sunlight. Maggie didn't care how they got there -- she just danced on the colors with delight. Different lenses allow us to see different things. A microscope won't help us if we want to look at the stars. A telescope doesn't help us find which germ causes an illness. Reading glasses don't help us read a sign down the road; most of us have to take the glasses off to read the sign. And so it is with different theologies of atonement; each helps us see something important about Jesus' death on the cross. Remember that atonement means to bring together what has been estranged. Atonement is to become at one. We are estranged from God because of our sin. Christians have tried to figure out how in Christ's death on the cross, he atoned for us, and brought us back to God. Today the atonement theology I'm going to talk about is called the satisfaction theory or substitutionary atonement. This satisfaction theory uses legal imagery. It was first discussed at length by Anselm, a monk in the eleventh century, who rose to be archbishop of Canterbury. He held that humanity flaunted the will of God by sinning. Since God governs the universe, God could not ignore “humanity's sin without upsetting the moral order of the entire creation. Even though in God's mercy God might wish to overlook humanity's transgression, God could not do so without being immoral, and this would be contrary to God's nature. To maintain the moral order, satisfaction must be given.” The satisfaction must be fully equal to the offense. Since the sin is humanity's, satisfaction must be given by a human. Yet sinful humanity can't compensate God for sin; even if humanity kept God's will perfectly, it is nothing more than what is already due to God. And so the satisfaction must be made by one who is both God and human. For that reason God became incarnate in Jesus.” (1) Anselm's theology came from his time; he based it on the “feudal culture in which he lived. In his era, human sin was seen as an insult to God's honor that he cannot simply overlook. Just as an insult by a serf against the honor of his lord demanded satisfaction, God also required compensation for the dishonor created by human sin. The only suitable action to offset the dishonor was the death of a perfectly sinless god-man who represented all of humanity.” John Calvin was a lawyer; is it any wonder that he, who lived 500 years after Anselm, would find much spiritual help in the satisfaction theory? By Calvin's time, it had become substitutionary atonement. Calvin wrote:
Here are the scripture verses that could be used to support substitutionary atonement:
For many Christians, satisfaction is the only way to understand Christ's atonement. But for some of us, it leaves us with too many questions to be completely adequate. The problem is how could God demand the death of an innocent person to satisfy his law? Throughout history, regimes bent on genocide or pogroms believe that violence, suffering and punishment of a few innocent people is justified if it benefits many more other people. Jesus tells us to love our enemies, forgive those who hurt us, and overcome evil with good. How could God demand the torture and death of an innocent man? For me, substitutionary atonement is not about God demanding justice, it is about Jesus volunteering to give up his life. This lens, or prism tells us more about Jesus' heroic character than about God's angry demands. As a child, I read the Chronicles of Narnia, by C.S. Lewis. In the first book, the powerful lion Aslan saved a child who had betrayed his brother and sisters and the magical inhabitants of Narnia. He gave himself up to the White Witch. She shaved off his mane and killed him on the ancient stone table. But the next day, Aslan was alive. The two sisters asked him how it could be, and he said, “the Witch knew the Deep Magic….[But] her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of Time. But if she could have looked a little further back, into the stillness and the darkness before Time dawned, she would have read there a different incantation. She would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor's stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backwards.” (3) Those were magical words when I read them as an eleven-year-old. At different times in our lives, different metaphors help us deepen our faith. It's especially important for us to know the ways the Bible speaks about the atonement so we can bring the gospel to others. Each of us will be called upon to witness to our faith by bringing a word of comfort to someone we care for. There is much grief and sadness in the world. I hope these sermons on atonement will help you feel equipped to share your faith when someone is hurting. Imagine a woman who is depressed and feeling worthless asking you about Jesus. You could say “your sins were so bad, you deserved to die, but Jesus replaced you on the cross and he died instead.” I doubt that would bring her much comfort. What if you used the ransom theory I talked about last week. You could say instead “You are worth so much and are so important that Jesus ransomed you from the power of sin, so that you don't have to be a captive anymore. You are worth Jesus' life.” Jesus spoke of giving living water to the Samaritan woman. He said “those who drink of the water that I will give them will never be thirsty. The water that I will give will become in them a spring of water gushing up to eternal life." And so the Samaritan woman spread Christ's living water to the others in her village. They believed in him because of her, and offered Jesus hospitality, and he stayed with them, in their Samaritan village for two days. Then they heard him themselves. We also are called upon to spread the living water of Jesus Christ. I love the word ‘gushing.' The living water isn't a tidy trickle, but a splashing spurting spray. The atonement isn't a single system that travels the same route over and over. We aren't limited to one way of thinking about the atonement; we have a rainbow to choose from and dance in. Let us celebrate that in our statement of faith. We said together this statement form the Confession of 1967 9.08-.09:
(1) Latourette, Kenneth Scott, A History of Christianity, vol. 1,Beginnings to 1500, p. 501. (2)Institutes 3.2.1 . (3) Lewis, C.S. The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe, “Deeper Magic from before the Dawn of Time,” p. 133. |
Return to List of Sermons |
Return to Welcome Page |